[ad_1]
Nunez-Mir, G. C. et al. Automated content analysis: addressing the big literature challenge in ecology and evolution. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1262–1272 (2016).
Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.
Xia, F., Wang, W., Bekele, T. M. & Liu, H. Big scholarly data: a survey. IEEE Trans. Big Data 3, 18–35 (2017).
Berrang-Ford, L. et al. Systematic mapping of global research on climate and health: a machine learning review. Lancet Planet. Health 5, e514–e525 (2021).
Callaghan, M. W., Minx, J. C. & Forster, P. M. A topography of climate change research. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 118–123 (2020).
Minx, J. C., Callaghan, M., Lamb, W. F., Garard, J. & Edenhofer, O. Learning about climate change solutions in the IPCC and beyond. Environ. Sci. Policy 77, 252–259 (2017).
Haddaway, N. R. et al. Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1582–1589 (2020).
Pullin, A. S. & Knight, T. M. Science informing Policy – a health warning for the environment. Environ. Evid. 1, 15 (2012).
Baker, K. A. & Weeks, S. M. An overview of systematic review. J. PeriAnesthesia Nurs. 29, 454–458 (2014).
Ahn, E. & Kang, H. Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 71, 103–112 (2018).
Elliott, J. H. et al. Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 91, 23–30 (2017).
Thomas, J. et al. Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 91, 31–37 (2017).
Callaghan, M. et al. Machine-learning-based evidence and attribution mapping of 100,000 climate impact studies. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 966–972 (2021).
Chakraborty, R. & Sherpa, P. Y. From climate adaptation to climate justice: critical reflections on the IPCC and Himalayan climate knowledges. Clim. Change 167, 49 (2021).
Rashidi, P. & Lyons, K. Democratizing global climate governance? The case of indigenous representation in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Globalizations 0, 1–16 (2021).
Iturbide, M. et al. Implementation of FAIR principles in the IPCC: the WGI AR6 Atlas repository. Sci. Data 9, 629 (2022).
Sherwood, S. C. et al. An assessment of earth’s climate sensitivity using multiple lines of evidence. Rev. Geophys. 58, e2019RG000678 (2020).
Petersen, A., Blackstock, J. & Morisetti, N. New leadership for a user-friendly IPCC. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 909–911 (2015).
Palutikof, J. P. et al. Enhancing the review process in global environmental assessments: the case of the IPCC. Environ. Sci. Policy 139, 118–129 (2023).
Ammar, W. et al. Construction of the literature graph in semantic scholar. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 3 (Industry Papers) 84–91 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-3011.
Fricke, S. Semantic scholar. J. Med. Library Assoc. 106, 145–147 (2018).
Wu, J. et al. CiteSeerX: AI in a digital library search engine. AI Mag. 36, 35–48 (2015).
Elicit: the AI research assistant. https://elicit.org/.
Guo, Y., Qiu, W., Wang, Y. & Cohen, T. Automated lay language summarization of biomedical scientific reviews. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. 35, 160–168 (2021).
Ibrahim Altmami, N. & El Bachir Menai, M. Automatic summarization of scientific articles: a survey. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inform. Sci. 34, 1011–1028 (2022).
Wadden, D. et al. Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims. in Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) 7534–7550 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020) https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.609.
Introducing ChatGPT. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt.
Alkaissi, H. & McFarlane, S. I. Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: implications in scientific writing. Cureus 15, e35179 (2023).
ChatClimate. https://www.chatclimate.ai/.
ClimateQ&A – a hugging face space by ekimetrics. https://huggingface.co/spaces/Ekimetrics/climate-question-answering.
Cummings, J. N. & Kiesler, S. Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Soc. Stud. Sci. 35, 703–722 (2005).
Dong, Y., Ma, H., Shen, Z. & Wang, K. A century of science: globalization of scientific collaborations, citations, and innovations. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 1437–1446 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3097983.3098016.
Kouzes, R. T., Myers, J. D. & Wulf, W. A. Collaboratories: doing science on the Internet. Computer 29, 40–46 (1996).
Godfrey, P., Gryz, J. & Lasek, P. Interactive visualization of large data sets. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Engin. 28, 2142–2157 (2016).
Keim, D. et al. Visual analytics: definition, process, and challenges. In Information Visualization: Human-Centered Issues and Perspectives (eds. Kerren, A., Stasko, J. T., Fekete, J.-D. & North, C.) 154–175 (Springer, 2008) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70956-5_7.
Liu, Z. & Stasko, J. Mental models, visual reasoning and interaction in information visualization: a top-down perspective. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 16, 999–1008 (2010).
Larkin, J. H. & Simon, H. A. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognit. Sci. 11, 65–100 (1987).
Pohl, M., Smuc, M. & Mayr, E. The user puzzle—explaining the interaction with visual analytics systems. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 18, 2908–2916 (2012).
Felizardo, K. R., Nakagawa, E. Y., Feitosa, D., Minghim, R. & Maldonado, J. C. An approach based on visual text mining to support categorization and classification in the systematic mapping. BCS Learning & Development, https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EASE2010.5 (2010).
Felizardo, K. R., Andery, G. F., Paulovich, F. V., Minghim, R. & Maldonado, J. C. A visual analysis approach to validate the selection review of primary studies in systematic reviews. Inform. Softw. Technol. 54, 1079–1091 (2012).
Stasko, J., Görg, C. & Liu, Z. Jigsaw: supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization. Inf. Vis. 7, 118–132 (2008).
Hsiao, T.-K., Fu, Y. & Schneider, J. Visualizing evidence-based disagreement over time: the landscape of a public health controversy 2002–2014. Proc. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 57, e315 (2020).
Trinquart, L., Johns, D. M. & Galea, S. Why do we think we know what we know? A metaknowledge analysis of the salt controversy. Int. J. Epidemiol. 45, 251–260 (2016).
Cook, J. et al. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024024 (2013).
van der Linden, S. The Gateway Belief Model (GBM): a review and research agenda for communicating the scientific consensus on climate change. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 42, 7–12 (2021).
Jones, M. W. et al. Climate change increases the risk of wildfires. Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4569829 (2020).
Smith, A. J. P., Jones, M. W., Abatzoglou, J. T., Canadell, J. G. & Betts, R. A. Climate change increases the risk of wildfires. Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4570195 (2020).
Dudley, H., Jordan, A. & Lorenzoni, I. Independent expert advisory bodies facilitate ambitious climate policy responses. Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4633677 (2021).
Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate. in Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)) 1513–1766 (Cambridge University Press, 2023) https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.013.
Climate Change Information for Regional Impact and for Risk Assessment. in Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)) 1767–1926 (Cambridge University Press, 2023) https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.014.
Terrestrial and Freshwater Ecosystems and Their Services. in Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)) 197–378 (Cambridge University Press, 2023) https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.004.
Impacts of 1.5 °C Global Warming on Natural and Human Systems. in Global Warming of 1.5 °C: IPCC Special Report on Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C above Pre-industrial Levels in Context of Strengthening Response to Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty (ed. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)) 175–312 (Cambridge University Press, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.005.
Land–climate interactions. in Climate Change and Land: IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems (ed. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)) 131–248 (Cambridge University Press, 2022) https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157988.004.
Reuters. Australia’s Massive Fires could Become Routine, Climate Scientists Warn (Reuters, 2020).
BBC News. Climate Change: Australia Fires will be ‘Normal’ in Warmer World (BBC News, 2020).
BBC News. Global Warming Driving California Wildfire Trends – Study (BBC News, 2020).
Climate change ‘increases the risk of wildfires’ https://public.wmo.int/en/media/news/climate-change-increases-risk-of-wildfires (2020).
BBC News. Is Climate Change to Blame for Australia’s Bushfires? (BBC News, 2019).
BBC News. Oregon Bootleg Fire: Evacuations as Largest US Fire Burns 364,000 Acres (BBC News, 2021).
Iriberri, A. & Leroy, G. A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Comput. Surv. 41, 11:1-11:29 (2009).
Rojo, A. & Ragsdale, R. G. A process perspective on participation in scholarly electronic forums. Sci. Commun. 18, 320–341 (1997).
Eijk, Mvander et al. Using online health communities to deliver patient-centered care to people with chronic conditions. J. Med. Internet Res. 15, e2476 (2013).
Franzoni, C., Scellato, G. & Stephan, P. Changing incentives to publish. Science 333, 702–703 (2011).
Friesike, S. & Schildhauer, T. Open science: many good resolutions, very few incentives, yet. In Incentives and Performance: Governance of Research Organizations (eds Welpe, I. M., Wollersheim, J., Ringelhan, S. & Osterloh, M.) 277–289 (Springer International Publishing, 2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_17.
Galiani, S., Gertler, P. & Romero, M. Incentives for Replication in Economics. 16 (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017) https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w23576/w23576.pdf.
Sharma, A., Lin, I. W., Miner, A. S., Atkins, D. C. & Althoff, T. Human–AI collaboration enables more empathic conversations in text-based peer-to-peer mental health support. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 46–57 (2023).
[ad_2]
Source link
